A latest public information request by Tampa Bay Occasions reporter Lawrence Mower has uncovered a revealing memo from Florida’s Workplace of Insurance coverage Regulation (OIR) that would mark a serious turning level in how the state handles insurance coverage regulation. The doc, obtained beneath the Freedom of Data Act, particulars a proposal to reunify the state’s fragmented insurance coverage oversight system—a system that no different state within the nation follows and that Florida itself created by means of a 1998 constitutional modification.
On the time, voters permitted the cut up as a good-government reform: Dismantle the highly effective elected Insurance coverage Commissioner’s workplace and distribute its duties between a newly created Division of Monetary Providers (DFS) and a individually administered OIR. The objective was to scale back political affect over insurance coverage regulation. However greater than 20 years later, it’s changing into clear that the experiment has had unintended penalties—and severe flaws.
In response to the OIR memo, this divided construction has weakened client safety, delayed enforcement, and created bureaucratic hurdles that serve nobody. In reality, between 2018 and 2023, of the 52,160 property and casualty complaints acquired by DFS, solely 5.2% had been referred to OIR for additional evaluate. Of these, solely a fraction concerned precise statutory violations, suggesting that client complaints typically get mishandled or by no means attain the specialists finest outfitted to take care of them.
Mower’s article, Because the Insurance coverage Disaster Spiraled, Did Florida Bury Shopper Complaints, paints a broader image of what seems to be a brewing energy wrestle between the Chief Monetary Officer’s workplace and the OIR. Whereas each declare a job in defending shoppers, the overlap has created confusion—and the friction is surfacing publicly. Florida’s distinctive, bifurcated mannequin leaves no clear chain of command. Because the OIR memo notes, even routine issues like human assets and buying are sophisticated by DFS’s administrative management, regardless of state regulation expressly forbidding such interference.
The implications of this disjointed oversight have been felt most acutely in latest scandals, the place delayed motion, lack of coordination, and blurred traces of authority contributed to failures in client safety. In high-profile circumstances involving insurance coverage firm insolvencies and client complaints, investigators struggled with sluggish information-sharing, duplicate work, and circumstances falling by means of the cracks—failures which may have been prevented beneath a unified regulatory construction.
OIR proposes to repair this by consolidating all insurance coverage regulatory features—together with client providers, agent and company investigations, and fraud enforcement—beneath a single roof. The mannequin would mirror what exists in most different states, the place a single Insurance coverage Commissioner has the authority and assets to behave swiftly and decisively on behalf of shoppers.
On the very least, the proposal is an admission that the OIR and DFS are failing to correctly regulate Florida’s insurance coverage business and supplies causes for the failure. This can be a vital memo all Florida leaders ought to research to alter the present established order of excessive premiums and complaints of underpaid and denied claims.
Critically, the proposal doesn’t search to recreate the previous, politicized mannequin of an elected Insurance coverage Commissioner. The OIR would stay a Cupboard company, with the Commissioner appointed by the Governor and Cupboard and confirmed by the Senate. Nonetheless, the company would have full management over its operations, higher enabling it to react to market issues, shield shoppers, and guarantee honest practices in an more and more careworn insurance coverage market.
Florida’s insurance coverage disaster calls for a regulatory framework that works. As Mower’s reporting exhibits, and because the OIR memo outlines, the state’s divided system is now not defensible. The time has come to put actual authority—whether or not full or not less than meaningfully shared—with the Insurance coverage Commissioner and transfer towards a construction that mirrors what has confirmed simpler. This experiment of a divided insurance coverage regulatory construction is just not working.
Twenty years in the past, Florida selected fragmentation to restrict political energy. Now, the lesson seems clear: fragmentation has weakened client protections as an alternative. If lawmakers act on this proposal, they’d be correcting a well-intentioned reform that, over time, merely didn’t ship.
Thought For The Day
“Step one in fixing an issue is to acknowledge that it does exist.”
— Zig Ziglar
