Within the wooded highlands of northern Arkansas, the place small cities have few dentists, water officers who serve greater than 20,000 individuals have for greater than a decade brazenly defied state regulation by refusing so as to add fluoride to the consuming water.
For its refusal, the Ozark Mountain Regional Public Water Authority has acquired lots of of state fines amounting to about $130,000, that are stuffed in a cardboard field and left unpaid, mentioned Andy Anderson, who’s against fluoridation and has led the water system for almost twenty years.
This Ozark area is amongst lots of of rural American communities that face a one-two punch to oral well being: a dire scarcity of dentists and an absence of fluoridated consuming water, which is extensively considered amongst dentists as some of the efficient instruments to stop tooth decay. However because the anti-fluoride motion builds unprecedented momentum, it could prove that the Ozarks weren’t behind the instances in spite of everything.
“We are going to finally win,” Anderson mentioned. “We will likely be vindicated.”
Fluoride, a naturally occurring mineral, retains tooth sturdy when added to consuming water, in keeping with the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention and the American Dental Affiliation. However the anti-fluoride motion has been energized since a authorities report final summer season discovered a doable hyperlink between decrease IQ in kids and consuming quantities of fluoride which might be increased than what’s advisable in American consuming water. Dozens of communities have determined to cease fluoridating in current months, and state officers in Florida and Texas have urged their water methods to do the identical. Utah is poised to develop into the primary state to ban it in faucet water.
Well being and Human Providers Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has lengthy espoused fringe well being theories, has referred to as fluoride an “industrial waste” and “harmful neurotoxin” and mentioned the Trump administration will suggest or not it’s faraway from all public consuming water.
Individually, Republican efforts to increase tax cuts and shrink federal spending might squeeze Medicaid, which might deepen present shortages of dentists in rural areas the place many residents rely upon the federal insurance coverage program for no matter dental care they’ll discover.
Dental consultants warn that the simultaneous erosion of Medicaid and fluoridation might exacerbate a disaster of rural oral well being and reverse many years of progress in opposition to tooth decay, significantly for kids and those that not often see a dentist.
“When you have of us with little entry to skilled care and no entry to water fluoridation,” mentioned Steven Levy, a dentist and main fluoride researcher on the College of Iowa, “then they’re lacking two of the massive pillars of tips on how to maintain wholesome for a lifetime.”
Many already are.
Overlapping ‘Dental Deserts’ and Fluoride-Free Zones
Almost 25 million People dwell in areas with out sufficient dentists — greater than twice as many as prior estimates by the federal authorities — in keeping with a current examine from Harvard College that measured U.S. “dental deserts” with extra depth and precision than earlier than.
Hawazin Elani, a Harvard dentist and epidemiologist who co-authored the examine, discovered that many scarcity areas are rural and poor, and rely closely on Medicaid. However many dentists don’t settle for Medicaid as a result of funds may be low, Elani mentioned.
The ADA has estimated that solely a 3rd of dentists deal with sufferers on Medicaid.
“I think this example is way worse for Medicaid beneficiaries,” Elani mentioned. “When you have Medicaid and your nearest dentists don’t settle for it, then you’ll possible should go to the third, or fourth, or the fifth.”
The Harvard examine recognized over 780 counties the place greater than half of the residents dwell in a scarcity space. Of these counties, no less than 230 even have principally or fully unfluoridated public consuming water, in keeping with a KFF evaluation of fluoride information revealed by the CDC. Which means individuals in these areas who can’t discover a dentist additionally don’t get safety for his or her tooth from their faucet water.
The KFF Well being Information evaluation doesn’t cowl your complete nation as a result of it doesn’t embrace non-public wells and 13 states don’t submit fluoride information to the CDC. However amongst people who do, most counties with a scarcity of dentists and unfluoridated water are within the south-central U.S., in a cluster that stretches from Texas to the Florida Panhandle and up into Kansas, Missouri, and Oklahoma.
Within the heart of that cluster is the Ozark Mountain Regional Public Water Authority, which serves the Arkansas counties of Boone, Marion, Newton, and Searcy. It has refused so as to add fluoride ever since Arkansas enacted a statewide mandate in 2011. After weekly fines started in 2016, the water system unsuccessfully challenged the fluoride mandate in state courtroom, then misplaced once more on enchantment.
Anderson, who has chaired the water system’s board since 2007, mentioned he want to problem the fluoride mandate in courtroom once more and would argue the case himself if obligatory. In a cellphone interview, Anderson mentioned he believes that fluoride can hamper the mind and physique to the purpose of creating individuals “get fats and lazy.”
“So if you happen to exit within the streets today, stroll down the streets, you’ll see a number of fats individuals carrying their pajamas out in public,” he mentioned.
Close by within the tiny, no-stoplight group of Leslie, Arkansas, which will get water from the Ozark system, the one dentist on the town operates out of a one-man clinic tucked behind an vintage retailer. Hand-painted lettering on the shop window advertises a “fairly good dentist.”
James Flanagin, a third-generation dentist who opened this clinic three years in the past, mentioned he was drawn to Leslie by the quaint charms and pleasant smiles of small-town life. However those self same smiles additionally reveal the unmistakable penalties of refusing to fluoridate, he mentioned.
“There is no such thing as a doubt that there’s extra dental decay right here than there would in any other case be,” he mentioned. “You’re going to have extra decay in case your water shouldn’t be fluoridated. That’s only a reality.”
Fluoride Seen as a Nice Public Well being Achievement
Fluoride was first added to public water in an American metropolis in 1945 and unfold to half of the U.S. inhabitants by 1980, in keeping with the CDC. Due to “the dramatic decline” in cavities that adopted, in 1999 the CDC dubbed fluoridation as one in every of 10 nice public well being achievements of the twentieth century.
Presently greater than 70% of the U.S. inhabitants on public water methods get fluoridated water, with a advisable focus of 0.7 milligrams per liter, or about three drops in a 55-gallon barrel, in keeping with the CDC.
Fluoride can be current in trendy toothpaste, mouthwash, dental varnish, and some meals and drinks — like raisins, potatoes, oatmeal, espresso, and black tea. However a number of dental consultants mentioned these merchandise don’t reliably attain as many low-income households as consuming water, which has an extra profit over toothpaste of strengthening kids’s tooth from inside as they develop.
Two current polls have discovered that the biggest share of People help fluoridation, however a large minority doesn’t. Polls from Axios/Ipsos and AP-NORC discovered that 48% and 40% of respondents wished to maintain fluoride in public water provides, whereas 29% and 26% supported its removing.
Chelsea Fosse, an skilled on oral well being coverage on the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, mentioned she anxious that misguided fears of fluoride would trigger many individuals to cease utilizing fluoridated toothpaste and polish simply as Medicaid cuts made it tougher to see a dentist.
The mixture, she mentioned, might be “devastating.”
“It will likely be visibly obvious what this does to the prevalence of tooth decay,” Fosse mentioned. “If we eliminate water fluoridation, if we make Medicaid cuts, and if we don’t help suppliers in finding and serving the highest-need populations, I really don’t know what we are going to do.”
A number of peer-reviewed research have proven what ending water fluoridation might seem like. Previously few years, research of cities in Alaska and Canada have proven that communities that stopped fluoridation noticed vital will increase in kids’s cavities compared with related cities that didn’t. A 2024 examine from Israel reported a “two-fold enhance” in dental therapies for youths inside 5 years after the nation stopped fluoridating in 2014.
Regardless of the advantages of fluoridation, it has been fiercely opposed by some since its inception, mentioned Catherine Hayes, a Harvard dental skilled who advises the American Dental Affiliation on fluoride and has studied its use for 3 many years.
Fluoridation was initially smeared as a communist plot in opposition to America, Hayes mentioned, after which later fears arose of doable hyperlinks to most cancers, which have been refuted by way of intensive scientific analysis. Within the ’80s, hysteria fueled fears of fluoride inflicting AIDS, which was “ludicrous,” Hayes mentioned.
Extra just lately, the anti-fluoride motion seized on worldwide analysis that implies excessive ranges of fluoride can hinder kids’s mind growth and has been boosted by high-profile authorized and political victories.
Final August, a hotly debated report from the Nationwide Institutes of Well being’s Nationwide Toxicology Program discovered “with average confidence” that publicity to ranges of fluoride which might be increased than what’s current in American consuming water is related to decrease IQ in kids. The report was primarily based on an evaluation of 74 research performed in different international locations, most of which have been thought of “low high quality” and concerned publicity of no less than 1.5 milligrams of fluoride per liter of water — or greater than twice the U.S. suggestion — in keeping with this system.
The next month, in a long-simmering lawsuit filed by fluoride opponents, a federal choose in California mentioned the doable hyperlink between fluoride and lowered IQ was too dangerous to disregard, then ordered the federal Environmental Safety Company to take nonspecified steps to decrease that threat. The EPA began to enchantment this ruling within the ultimate days of the Biden administration, however the Trump administration might reverse course.
The EPA and Division of Justice declined to remark. The White Home and Division of Well being and Human Providers didn’t reply to questions on fluoride.
Regardless of the Nationwide Toxicology Program’s report, Hayes mentioned, no affiliation has been proven so far between lowered IQ and the quantity of fluoride truly current in most People’ water. The courtroom ruling might immediate extra analysis performed within the U.S., Hayes mentioned, which she hoped would lastly put the marketing campaign in opposition to fluoride to relaxation.
“It’s one of many nice mysteries of my profession, what sustains it,” Hayes mentioned. “What considerations me is that there’s some perception amongst some members of the general public — and a few of our policymakers — that there’s some reality to this.”
Not all consultants have been so dismissive of the toxicology program’s report. Bruce Lanphear, a kids’s well being researcher at Simon Fraser College in British Columbia, revealed an editorial in January that mentioned the findings ought to immediate well being organizations “to reassess the dangers and advantages of fluoride, significantly for pregnant ladies and infants.”
“The people who find themselves proposing fluoridation must now show it’s protected,” Lanphear informed NPR in January. “That’s what this examine does. It shifts the burden of proof — or it ought to.”
Cities and States Rethink Fluoride
Not less than 14 states thus far this 12 months have thought of or are contemplating payments that might raise fluoride mandates or prohibit fluoride in consuming water altogether. In February, Utah lawmakers handed the nation’s first ban, which Republican Gov. Spencer Cox informed ABC4 Utah he intends to signal. And each Florida Surgeon Normal Joseph Ladapo and Texas Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller have referred to as for his or her respective states to finish fluoridation.
“I don’t need Massive Brother telling me what to do,” Miller informed The Dallas Morning Information in February. “Authorities has pressured this on us for too lengthy.”
Moreover, dozens of cities and counties have determined to cease fluoridation up to now six months — together with no less than 16 communities in Florida with a mixed inhabitants of greater than 1.6 million — in keeping with information stories and the Fluoride Motion Community, an anti-fluoride group.
Stuart Cooper, govt director of that group, mentioned the motion’s unprecedented momentum can be additional supercharged if Kennedy and the Trump administration comply with by way of on a suggestion in opposition to fluoride.
Cooper predicted that almost all U.S. communities can have stopped fluoridating inside years.
“I believe what you’re seeing in Florida, the place each group is falling like dominoes, goes to now occur in the USA,” he mentioned. “I believe we’re seeing absolutely the finish of it.”
If Cooper’s prediction is true, Hayes mentioned, widespread decay can be seen inside years. Youngsters’ tooth will rot of their mouths, she mentioned, although “we all know tips on how to fully stop it.”
“It’s pointless ache and struggling,” Hayes mentioned. “When you go into any kids’s hospital throughout this nation, you’ll see a ready record of children to get into the working room to get their tooth fastened as a result of they’ve extreme decay as a result of they haven’t had entry to both fluoridated water or different sorts of fluoride. Sadly, that’s simply going to worsen.”
Methodology: How We Counted
This KFF Well being Information article identifies communities with an elevated threat of tooth decay by combining information on areas with dentist shortages and unfluoridated consuming water. Our evaluation merged Harvard College analysis on dentist-shortage areas with giant datasets on public water methods revealed by the U.S. Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention.The Harvard analysis decided that just about 25 million People dwell in dentist-shortage areas that span a lot of rural America. The CDC information particulars the populations served and fluoridation standing of greater than 38,000 public water methods in 37 states. We labeled counties as having elevated threat of tooth decay in the event that they met three standards:Greater than half of the residents dwell in a dentist-shortage space recognized by Harvard.The variety of individuals receiving unfluoridated water from water methods primarily based in that county quantities to greater than half of the county’s inhabitants.The variety of individuals receiving unfluoridated water from water methods primarily based in that county quantities to no less than half of the whole inhabitants of all water methods primarily based in that county, even when these methods reached past the county borders, which many do.
Our evaluation recognized roughly 230 counties that meet these standards, that means they’ve each a dire scarcity of dentists and largely unfluoridated consuming water.
However this complete is definitely an undercount. 13 states don’t report water system information to the CDC, and the company information doesn’t embrace non-public wells, most of that are unfluoridated.
KFF Well being Information information editor Holly Okay. Hacker contributed to this text.
